This is mathematica-benchmarks-available? in view mode; [Up]
Date: Sun 25-Nov-1991 17:04:57 From: ronchet@itnsg1.cineca.it (marco ronchetti) Subject: mathematica benchmarks available? Is anyone aware of a benchmark to compare Mathematica on a NeXTStation against Mathematica on Sun, 486 and Macs? Thanks
Date: Sun 27-Nov-1991 05:27:01 From: rpomeroy@picard (Ronald Pomeroy) Subject: Re: mathematica benchmarks available? In article <1991Nov25.170457.25500@itnsg1.cineca.it> ronchet@itnsg1.cineca.it (marco ronchetti) writes: > Is anyone aware of a benchmark to compare Mathematica on a NeXTStation > against Mathematica on Sun, 486 and Macs? Thanks
Date: Sun 27-Nov-1991 20:01:52 From: kirchner@cs.umn.edu (Roger B. Kirchner) Subject: Re: mathematica benchmarks available? Executing Timing[ Animate[Plot3D[ BesselJ[0, Sqrt[x^2 + y^2] + t], {x, -10, 10}, {y, -10, 10}, Axes -> False, PlotRange -> {-0.5, 1.0}, DisplayFunction -> Identity ], {t, 0, 8}]] on a 28MB cube took 222.333 Seconds to compute the 24 images. What does this mean in light of the results from Ken_Thigpen@next.com on 16MB machines? Sparc 2 : 5 minutes SGI Indigo: 3 minutes
These are the contents of the former NiCE NeXT User Group NeXTSTEP/OpenStep software archive, currently hosted by Marcel Waldvogel and Netfuture.ch.