This is named-DOA-in-1.0 in view mode; [Up]
Date: Sun 30-Oct-1989 08:03:58 From: Unknown Subject: named DOA in 1.0 We upgraded our primary nameserver to 1.0, and discovered to our horror that named doesn't work--it dies instantly with a Bus Error. We've pressed what is probably our last remaining 0.9 system into service, but if anyone has named working under 1.0 (preferably a BIND 4.8 port), I'd like to hear from you ASAP. This won't wait until 1.1, or even until next week. Can I run the binary from 0.9? -=EPS=- trying my best to avoid embarrassment and silence the chants of "buy a Sun" >From: epsilon@wet.UUCP (Eric P. Scott)
Date: Sun 01-Nov-1989 10:51:14 From: Unknown Subject: Re: named DOA in 1.0 I got a message from someone who said (paraphrasing) "I'm running NeXT's named and it works for me." Sure enough, it did. What was the difference? I had WKS records, he didn't. WKS records seem to be deadly to 1.0's named. (Thanks to those who've offered BIND 4.8.3 ports) -=EPS=- >From: chrome@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Jon Johnsen)
These are the contents of the former NiCE NeXT User Group NeXTSTEP/OpenStep software archive, currently hosted by Marcel Waldvogel and Netfuture.ch.