This is 0.9-Terminal in view mode; [Up]
Date: Sun 16-May-1989 17:58:31 From: Unknown Subject: 0.9 Terminal When I have multiple copies of Terminal running, quitting one of them frequently zaps them all. This didn't happen under 0.8. Does it happen to anyone else, or am I just talented?
Date: Sun 16-May-1989 19:42:08 From: Unknown Subject: Re: 0.9 Terminal I see this problem too; though so far it seems like I've only noticed it happen when I've got an rlogin running in two windows to the same host. When one exits, the goes with it too. Weird. On another topic, why doesn't the spooling system reverse the pages on the printer on files printed from WriteNow. When printing the release notes, the pages are stacked on the printer in the wrong order. Under 0.8, the (conforming) PostScript files were run through psrv before being printed. Louis A. Mamakos WA3YMH Internet: louie@TRANTOR.UMD.EDU University of Maryland, Computer Science Center - Systems Programming >From: gore@eecs.nwu.edu (Jacob Gore)
Date: Sun 16-May-1989 22:06:00 From: Unknown Subject: Re: 0.9 Terminal I have seen both Terminal and Workspace quit uxexpectely or get garbage pixels occasionally. -------------------- Brad Carlson <carlson@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu> or <b-carlson@uiuc.edu> University of Illinos--Micro Resource Center--NeXT guru >From: carlson@aftac.tis.llnl.gov (John Carlson)
Date: Sun 24-May-1989 23:09:54 From: Unknown Subject: Re: 0.9 Terminal In article <1006@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner) writes: >When I have multiple copies of Terminal running, quitting one of >them frequently zaps them all. This didn't happen under 0.8. >Does it happen to anyone else, or am I just talented? >-- >Steve Dorner, U of Illinois Computing Services Office >Internet: s-dorner@uiuc.edu UUCP: {convex,uunet}!uiucuxc!dorner >IfUMust: (217) 244-1765 This problem is fixed and will be in 1.0. Sorry for any inconvenience. morris meyer Software Engineer NeXT OS Group
Date: Sun 25-May-1989 00:58:30 From: Unknown Subject: Re: 0.9 Terminal In article <5059@pt.cs.cmu.edu> tj@wb1.cs.cmu.edu (Cal Thixton) writes: >In article <1006@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner) writes: >>When I have multiple copies of Terminal running, quitting one of >>them frequently zaps them all. This didn't happen under 0.8. >This problem is fixed and will be in 1.0. Sorry for any inconvenience. Is there any way these kinds of fixes could be posted to the network or left or anonymous ftp somewhere? Or is there a policy against releasing software between official releases? Thanks for any information *anyone* can provide.
Date: Sun 25-May-1989 07:39:17 From: Unknown Subject: Re: 0.9 Terminal >>In article <1006@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> (Steve Dorner) writes: >>This problem is fixed and will be in 1.0. Sorry for any inconvenience. >Is there any way these kinds of fixes could be posted to the network >or left or anonymous ftp somewhere? Or is there a policy against releasing >software between official releases? I talked to our local SE about what NeXT's official policy was on distributing patches was while I was setting up the cs.orst.edu ftp archive site. The reply was that NeXT will not distribute patches (period). They figure you can wait until the next release of the OS. I have a directory on the ftp site that has been set up from the start for the purpose of holding official NeXT patches but it looks like it will probably remain empty unless NeXT changes their policy. Bryce Jasmer jasmerb@hobbes.cs.orst.edu (next-ftp@cs.orst.edu) >From: grahamr@prism.cs.orst.edu (Robert Graham)
These are the contents of the former NiCE NeXT User Group NeXTSTEP/OpenStep software archive, currently hosted by Marcel Waldvogel and Netfuture.ch.