ftp.nice.ch/peanuts/GeneralData/Usenet/news/1989/CSN-89.tar.gz#/comp-sys-next/1989/Jul/Has-anyone-found-the-problem-with-LIST-in-ftpd?

This is Has-anyone-found-the-problem-with-LIST-in-ftpd? in view mode; [Up]


Date: Sun 22-Jul-1989 23:17:17 From: Unknown Subject: Has anyone found the problem with LIST in ftpd? (reproduce: ftp localhost; dir ... bye-bye!) I compiled the latest bsd source: same symptom. -=EPS=- / SFSU >From: epsilon@wet.UUCP (Eric P. Scott)
Date: Sun 29-Jul-1989 09:43:02 From: Unknown Subject: Re: Has anyone found the problem with LIST in ftpd? Oops! There are more places in the code where SIGSEGVs are breeding. This is not NeXT's fault--the problems are in Berkeley's code (almost entirely in the post-Nov. 1988 "security improvements"). Some time in the (hopefully near) future a better-behaved version will be available in source form from UUNET. -=EPS=- >From: jgreely@oz.cis.ohio-state.edu (J Greely)

These are the contents of the former NiCE NeXT User Group NeXTSTEP/OpenStep software archive, currently hosted by Marcel Waldvogel and Netfuture.ch.