ftp.nice.ch/peanuts/GeneralData/Usenet/news/1989/CSN-89.tar.gz#/comp-sys-next/1989/Jan-Apr/dvi2ps-on-NeXT

This is dvi2ps-on-NeXT in view mode; [Up]


Date: Sun 24-Jan-1989 17:58:02 From: Unknown Subject: Re: dvi2ps on NeXT In article <17821@gatech.edu> gil@gatech.edu (Gil Neiger) writes: >Can NeXT use the output of dvi2ps? How can such a postscript file be >printed (on the NeXT printer)? Can it be previewed (yet)? Turns out yes, and with not much difficulty. I just played with it some, and the "letter" command in the /@letter routine was causing some trouble. I commented that out, and, voila, the files printed... You should note that the files I was using were generated by dvi2ps 2.00. The comments in the postscript header indicate "last modified Aug 25/85." To preview the output of dvi2ps, you really need a page-oriented previewer. (My little Yap just doesn't cut it; it's good for more interactive Postscript use.) A page-oriented previewer will probably be included in the 0.9 Demos directory. Ali Ozer, NeXT Developer Support aozer@NeXT.com >From: abe@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Vic Abell)
Date: Sun 26-Jan-1989 02:06:25 From: Unknown Subject: Re: dvi2ps on NeXT In article <6308@polya.Stanford.EDU>, ali@polya.Stanford.EDU (Ali T. Ozer) writes: > In article <17821@gatech.edu> gil@gatech.edu (Gil Neiger) writes: > >Can NeXT use the output of dvi2ps? How can such a postscript file be > >printed (on the NeXT printer)? Can it be previewed (yet)? > > Turns out yes, and with not much difficulty. I just played with it some, [deleted] > To preview the output of dvi2ps, you really need > a page-oriented previewer. (My little Yap just doesn't cut it; > it's good for more interactive Postscript use.) A page-oriented > previewer will probably be included in the 0.9 Demos directory. > > Ali Ozer, NeXT Developer Support > aozer@NeXT.com I seriously suggest that NeXT consider geting access to the VorTeX projects dvitool. It is <the> superior previewer. Now before anyone jumps on me, let me qualfy that. It only works for TeX dvi files. But if TeX is what you want to work with, that is the correct way to go. It's redundant to turn TeX .dvi files into horriffic postscript with scads of downloaded fonts, and then hope that some poor little screen previewer can deal with it. None will be able to. I imagine that a deal could be struck with Berkeley... Just a suggestion... Are you listening, NeXT? >From: feldman@umd5.umd.edu (Mark Feldman)

These are the contents of the former NiCE NeXT User Group NeXTSTEP/OpenStep software archive, currently hosted by Marcel Waldvogel and Netfuture.ch.